Burning at the stake. |
Burning
at the stake in public was used in
It is not
known when burning was first used in Britain, but there is a recorded burning
for heresy in 1222, when a deacon of the church was burnt at Oxford for
embracing the Jewish faith so he could marry a Jew.
In 1401, the king authorised a Statute of Heresy which gave the clergy power to
arrest and try those suspected of heresy. The first to suffer under the new act
was one William Sautre, a priest, who was executed at (Kings) Lynn in 1402. This
statute was repealed but in 1553, burning was re-introduced by Henry VIII’s
daughter, Mary Tudor ("Bloody Mary") and 274 burnings of both sexes
for heresy were recorded during her five year reign (reign of terror) between
1553 and 1558. In most cases their only
"crime" was following the Protestant faith. The normal place of
execution in
Burning
was in use throughout Europe at this time and was particularly favoured by the
Spanish Inquisition as it did not involve shedding of the victim's blood, which
was disallowed under the prevailing Roman Catholic doctrine, and because it
ensured that the condemned had no body to take into the next life (which was
believed to be a very severe punishment in itself). It was also thought at that time that burning
cleansed the soul which was considered important for those convicted of
witchcraft and heresy.
Although many people might associate burning at the stake with
witchcraft, it was much less used for that offence in
Note : (wirried means strangled and escheat means confiscated)
The last person to be burned as a witch in
It is claimed that as many as 200,000 people were burned for witchcraft in
Three
slightly different methods of burning were used. The first, consisted of using
a heap of faggots piled around a wooden stake above which the prisoner was
attached with chains or iron hoops. The British and Spanish Inquisition
preferred this method as it had the greatest visual impact. This form of burning typically subjects the
prisoner to a far more agonising death as it some time before the flames reach
head level. In most cases of treason and
witchcraft the prisoner was strangled first before the fire was lit. In
The
second method was to tie the condemned to the stake and heap faggots all round
them, effectively hiding their sufferings, so that they died inside a wall of
flames . It is said that Joan of Arc died like this. It is thought that this method led to a much
quicker death because the victim was forced to breathe the flame and hot gasses
surrounding their face. The heat of the
air causes the lining of the trachea to swell up thus blocking the airway and
leading to suffocation within a few minutes.
The third method, used in
Until
1790, every woman convicted of counterfeiting gold or silver coin of the realm,
was sentenced to be drawn on a hurdle to the place of execution and there
" to be burned with fire till she was dead." (Blackstone's
Commentaries, 204. Ibid, 377) In England
women who were sentenced to be burnt were allowed by law to be strangled with a
rope before the fire got to them and thus died in much the same way as they
would have by hanging. In some of the
later cases of burning strangling with a cord was replaced with hanging. The stake had a hook or bracket at the top
from which the woman was hanged until dead, prior to a chain being put around
her waist and the faggots lit. The
report of the execution of Susannah Lott
at
On the
Continent, strangling before burning was also allowed, the rope being called a
"retentum." In some Nordic
countries, a small barrel of gunpowder was tied to the prisoner which was meant
to explode on contact with the flames, thus giving them a fairly instant
death. If they were neither strangled or
blown up, they died from a combination of shock, burning of the lungs and air
passages and smoke inhalation, all of which took a considerable amount of time
to kill and caused extreme pain.
Elizabeth Gaunt was the last woman to be burnt for high treason in the normal
sense of the word. She was executed in 1685, having been convicted of
involvement in the Rye House plot. She was denied strangulation and was thus
burned alive. The burning of a woman for treason at Tyburn is depicted here.
18th
century burnings.
Between
1702 and 1734, 10 women were burned at
Catherine Hayes was burned at Tyburn on
Elizabeth Wright was burned for coining on
Although burning was not a common punishment by this time, at least 33 women
suffered this fate between 1735 and 1789.
They were:
Name |
Date |
Place |
Crime |
Margaret Onion |
08/08/1735 |
Chelmsford |
Murdered husband |
Mary Fawson |
08/08/1735 |
Northampton |
Murdered husband |
Ann Mudd |
25/06/1737 |
Tyburn |
Murdered husband |
Mary Bird |
01/07/1737 |
Ely |
Murdered husband |
Mary Groke or Troke (age 16) |
18/03/1738 |
Winchester |
Murdered mistress |
Ann Goodson |
12/04/1738 |
Guildford |
Murdered husband |
Susannah Broom (age 67) |
|
Tyburn |
Murdered husband |
Elizabeth Moreton (or Owen) |
10/08/1744 |
Evesham |
Murdered husband |
Mary Johnson |
?/04/1747 |
Lincoln |
Murdered husband |
Amy Hutchinson |
07/11/1749 |
Ely |
Murdered husband |
Elizabeth Packard |
?/?/1750 |
Exeter |
Murdered husband |
Ann Whale (age 21) |
08/08/1752 |
Horsham |
Murdered husband |
Ann Williams |
13/04/1753 |
Over, near |
Murdered husband |
Susannah Bruford (age 19) |
03/09/1753 |
Wells (Somerset) |
Murdered husband |
Mary Ellah |
28/03/1757 |
York |
Murdered husband |
Alice Davis |
31/03/1758 |
Tyburn |
Coining (High Treason) |
Margaret Bedingfield |
08/04/1763 |
Ipswich |
Murdered husband |
Mary Heald |
23/04/1763 |
Chester |
Murdered husband |
Mary Saunders |
21/03/1764 |
Monmouth |
Murdered mistress |
Mary Norwood (age 33) |
08/05/1765 |
Ilchester (Somerset) |
Murdered husband |
Ann Sowerby |
10/08/1767 |
York |
Murdered husband |
Susannah Lott |
21/07/1769 |
Maidstone |
Murdered husband |
Mary Hilton (or Hulton) |
06/04/1772 |
Lancaster |
Murdered husband |
Elizabeth Herring |
13/09/1773 |
Tyburn |
Murdered husband |
Margaret Ryan |
18/03/1776 |
Maidstone |
Murdered husband |
Elizabeth Bordingham |
30/03/1776 |
York |
Murdered husband |
Ann Cruttenden (age 80) |
08/08/1776 |
Horsham |
Murdered husband |
Isabella Condon |
27/10/1779 |
Tyburn |
Coining (High Treason) |
Rebecca Downing |
29/06/1782 |
Exeter |
Murdered mistress |
Mary Bailey |
08/03/1784 |
Winchester |
Murdered husband |
Phoebe Harris |
21/06/1786 |
Newgate |
Coining (High Treason) |
Margaret Sullivan |
25/06/1788 |
Newgate |
Coining (High Treason) |
Catherine Murphy |
18/03/1789 |
Newgate |
Coining (High Treason) |
*Over is
a village about a mile from
Elizabeth Webber (or Webster) was probably burned at
At the
September Sessions of the Old Bailey on the 8th of September 1773, Elizabeth
Herring was indicted for “feloniously, traitorously, and of her malice
aforethought, making an assault upon Robert Herring, her husband, and with a
certain case knife giving him a mortal wound on the right side of the throat,
of the length of one inch, and the depth of two inches, of which wound he
instantly died, on August the 5th of that year.” She was convicted of Petty Treason (note the
word “traitorously” in the indictment) and the Recorder passed the following
sentence upon her, "you Elizabeth Herring are to be led from hence to the
Gaol from whence you came; and on Monday next you are to be drawn on a hurdle
to the place of execution; where you are to be burnt with fire until you are
dead." The sentence was carried out
at Tyburn in front of some 20,000 spectators on
The last woman to be burnt for petty treason, i.e. the murder of her husband in
The last three women to be burnt for coining offences were executed outside
London’s Newgate prison, these being Phoebe Harris on Wednesday, the 21st of
June 1786, (Click here
for a detailed account of her case), Margaret Sullivan on Wednesday, the 25th
of June 1788 and Catherine Murphy (also known as Christian Bowman), who was put
to death on Wednesday, the 18th of March 1789.
Margaret Sullivan and her co-accused, Jeremiah Grace, came to trial at the 7th
of May Sessions of the Old Bailey in 1788.
They were indicted as follows, “for that they, on the 29th of April, a
piece of base coin resembling the current silver coin of this kingdom, called a
shilling, falsely and deceitfully, feloniously and traitorously did colour with
materials, producing the colour of silver.”
For this crime of High Treason, Jeremiah was sentenced to be hanged and
Margaret to be burnt.
Catherine
Murphy’s execution was to be the last burning of a woman in
On
Executions
by burning at Newgate were distinctly unpopular with the local residents of
what was a respectable business area of the City. They had sent a petition to the Lord Mayor
requesting that Phoebe Harris’ execution be carried out elsewhere. There was an early version of “not in my back
yard” rather than a protest against the severity of her punishment. It was later reported that some locals became
ill from the smoke from her body. There
were similar protests over the Sullivan and Murphy executions and a great
feeling of relief when Sophia Girton was reprieved, and the whole ghastly
business passed into history under the provisions of the Treason Act of
1790. The Sheriffs were also becoming
increasingly unhappy about attending burnings, and it was they who brought
forward the Bill to end this practice.
Even though by this time the condemned woman was dead before the faggots
were lit, it must have still been a gruesome and revolting spectacle and one
which conveyed a feeling of injustice.
Men convicted of coining offences were hanged in the same way as other
condemned males. The Times newspaper
took up this theme after Phoebe’s burning and printed the following article: “The execution of a woman for coining on
Wednesday morning, reflects a scandal upon the law and was not only inhuman,
but shamefully indelicate and shocking. Why should the law in this species of
offence inflict a severer punishment upon a woman, than a man. It is not an
offence which she can perpetrate alone - in every such case the insistence of a
man has been found the operating motive upon the woman; yet the man is but
hanged, and the woman burned.” Other
London newspapers carried similar articles.
Similar outrage was expressed two years later at the burning of Margaret
Sullivan, although strangely there was little media interest at the burning of
Christian Murphy.